More on “Man With The Red Turban”

"Clockwise from top left: Filippino Lippi, The Dead Christ Mourned by Nicodemus and Two Angels, detail; Jan van Eyck, Self-portrait or Man in a Red Turban (1433); Dürer, Portrait of Michael Wolmegut (1516); Adam Kraft, Self-portrait detail from the Eucharistic Tabernacle (1493-6) in St. Lorenz, Nuremberg." (Source: Every Painter Paints Himself)

“Clockwise from top left: Filippino Lippi, The Dead Christ Mourned by Nicodemus and Two Angels, detail; Jan van Eyck, Self-portrait or Man in a Red Turban (1433); Dürer, Portrait of Michael Wolmegut (1516); Adam Kraft, Self-portrait detail from the Eucharistic Tabernacle (1493-6) in St. Lorenz, Nuremberg.” (Source: Every Painter Paints Himself)

In response to my recent post “Why is this man wearing a turban?“, friend and colleague Lori Way writes:

I liked your recent post about Jan van Eyck’s Man with the Red Turban. The turban was, at that time, considered commonplace for artists to wear. Not only did it keep artistic media out of one’s hair while in the studio, but it also came to be known as a status symbol. Here is a website that has a little more information about the artist’s turban (be sure to click through to all of the thumbnails).

Many also consider it likely that this particular painting is a self portrait of Jan van Eyck due to the fact that his fixed gaze is similar to what one experiences when looking in a mirror.

While we live in a world today that often misinterprets the turban, it’s an interesting note that this article of clothing was once patronized by Europe’s Renaissance artists in an entirely different context.

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: